{"id":25861,"date":"2019-12-29T14:42:30","date_gmt":"2019-12-29T14:42:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/?page_id=25861"},"modified":"2023-06-20T17:47:08","modified_gmt":"2023-06-20T17:47:08","slug":"man-made-sources-of-radiation","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/sources-of-radiation\/man-made-sources-of-radiation\/","title":{"rendered":"Man-made Sources of Radiation"},"content":{"rendered":"<div   id="8n9s8rpp6h"     class=\"lgc-column lgc-grid-parent lgc-grid-100 lgc-tablet-grid-100 lgc-mobile-grid-100 lgc-equal-heights \"><div   id="8n9s8rpp6h"     class=\"inside-grid-column\">\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Natural-and-Artificial-Radiation-Sources.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-25694\" src=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Natural-and-Artificial-Radiation-Sources-300x209.png\" alt=\"Natural and Artificial Radiation Sources\" width=\"300\" height=\"209\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Natural-and-Artificial-Radiation-Sources-300x209.png 300w, https:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/Natural-and-Artificial-Radiation-Sources.png 687w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/strong><strong>Radiation is all around us<\/strong>. In, around, and above the world we live in. It is a natural energy force that surrounds us, and it is a part of our natural world that has been here since the birth of our planet. From the beginning of time, all living creatures have been, and are still being, exposed to<a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-power\/reactor-physics\/atomic-nuclear-physics\/radiation\/ionizing-radiation\/\">\u00a0ionizing radiation<\/a>. Ionizing radiation is generated through <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-power\/nuclear-reactions\/\">nuclear reactions<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/radioactivity-nuclear-decay\/\">nuclear decay<\/a>, very high temperature, or acceleration of charged particles in electromagnetic fields. But in general, there are two broad categories of <strong>radiation sources<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Natural Background Radiation<\/strong>. Natural background radiation includes radiation produced by the Sun, lightning, primordial radioisotopes or supernova explosions, etc.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Man-Made Sources of Radiation<\/strong>. Manufactured sources include medical uses of radiation, residues from nuclear tests, industrial uses of radiation, etc.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Special Reference: Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Annex B. UNSCEAR. New York, 2010. ISBN: 978-92-1-142274-0.<\/p>\n<h2>Man-made Sources of Radiation<\/h2>\n<p>Since ionizing radiation has many industrial and medical uses, people can also be exposed to manufactured sources of radiation. Manufactured sources include medical uses of radiation, residues from nuclear tests, industrial uses of radiation, television, and numerous other radiation-producing devices. For example, in some kinds of smoke detectors, you can meet manufactured radionuclides such as <strong>americium-241. <\/strong>This manufactured radionuclide is used to ionize the air and detect smoke.<\/p>\n<p>It must be noted that most of these exposures are very low in intensity and the total dose and do not pose larger health effects. In each case, the usefulness of ionizing radiation must be balanced with its hazards. Nowadays, a compromise has been found, and most of the uses of radiation are optimized. Today it is almost unbelievable that x-rays were, at one time, used to find the right pair of shoes (i.e., shoe-fitting fluoroscopy). Measurements made in recent years indicate that the doses to the feet were in the range of 0.07 \u2013 0.14 Gy for a 20-second exposure. This practice was halted when the risks of ionizing radiation were better understood.<\/p>\n<p>There are two distinct groups exposed to manufactured radiation sources. The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) itemized types of human exposures as:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>public exposure<\/strong>\u00a0is the exposure of individual members of the public and the population in general<\/li>\n<li><strong>occupational radiation exposure<\/strong>, which is the exposure of workers in situations where their exposure is directly related to or required by their work<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Public Exposure<\/h3>\n<p>In general, the following manufactured sources expose the public to radiation:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Medical Exposures (by far, the most significant manufactured source)\n<ul>\n<li>Diagnostic x-rays<\/li>\n<li>Nuclear medicine procedures (iodine-131, cesium-137, technetium-99m etc.)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Consumer Products\n<ul>\n<li>Building and road construction materials<\/li>\n<li>Smoking cigarettes (polonium-210)<\/li>\n<li>Combustible fuels, including gas and coal<\/li>\n<li>X-ray security systems<\/li>\n<li>Televisions<\/li>\n<li>Smoke detectors (americium)<\/li>\n<li>Lantern mantles (thorium)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>To a lesser degree, the public is also exposed to radiation from the nuclear fuel cycle, from uranium mining and milling to the disposal of used (spent) fuel. Noteworthy, the public is also exposed to radiation from so-called \u201c<strong>enhanced sources of naturally occurring radioactive material<\/strong>.\u201d This also means industries such as <strong>metal mining<\/strong>, <strong>coal mining,<\/strong> and power production from coal create additional exposures due to the densification of naturally occurring radionuclides. The public receives minimal exposure from the transportation of radioactive materials and fallout from nuclear weapons testing and reactor accidents (such as Chernobyl).<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, most regulatory bodies require limiting the maximum radiation exposure to individual public members to 100 mrem (1 mSv) per year.<\/p>\n<h3>Occupational Exposure<\/h3>\n<p>As was written, occupational exposure is workers\u2019 exposure in situations where their exposure is directly related to or required by their work. According to ICRP, occupational exposure refers to all exposure incurred by workers in the course of their work, except for<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>excluded exposures and exposures from exempt activities involving radiation or exempt sources<\/li>\n<li>any medical exposure<\/li>\n<li>the normal local natural background radiation.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>In general, occupationally exposed individuals work in the following areas:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Fuel cycle facilities<\/li>\n<li>Industrial radiography<\/li>\n<li>Radiology departments (medical)<\/li>\n<li>Nuclear medicine departments<\/li>\n<li>Radiation oncology departments<\/li>\n<li>Nuclear power plants<\/li>\n<li>Government and university research laboratories<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Such individuals are exposed to varying types and amounts of radiation, depending on their jobs and work sources. For that reason, most regulatory bodies require to limit occupational exposure to adults working with radioactive material to 5000 mrem (50 mSv) per year. Toward that end, employers carefully monitor the exposure of these individuals using instruments called dosimeters worn on a position of the body representative of its exposure. In most situations of occupational exposure, the effective dose, E, can be derived from operational quantities using the following formula:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-25528\" src=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Occupational-Exposure-External-and-Internal-1.png\" alt=\"Occupational Exposure - External and Internal.\" width=\"314\" height=\"202\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Occupational-Exposure-External-and-Internal-1.png 314w, https:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/Occupational-Exposure-External-and-Internal-1-300x193.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 314px) 100vw, 314px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/effective-dose\/committed-dose\/\"><strong>committed dose<\/strong><\/a> is a dose quantity that measures the stochastic health risk due to an <strong>intake of radioactive material<\/strong> into the human body.<\/p>\n<p>See also: <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/protection-from-exposures\/radiation-dose-measuring-and-monitoring-operational-quantities\/\">Dose Monitoring<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Medical Exposures &#8211; Doses from Medical Radiation Sources<\/h2>\n<p>Radiation is used in a variety of medical examinations and treatments. Doses from <strong>medical radiation sources<\/strong> are naturally determined by whether a person underwent a treatment or not. In general, radiation exposures from medical diagnostic examinations are low (especially in diagnostic uses). Doses may also be high (only for therapeutic uses). Still, in each case, they must always be justified by the benefits of accurate diagnosis of possible disease conditions or by benefits of accurate treatment. These doses include contributions from medical and dental diagnostic radiology (diagnostic X-rays), clinical nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy.<\/p>\n<p>The medical use of ionizing radiation remains a rapidly changing field. In any case, the usefulness of ionizing radiation must be balanced with its hazards. Nowadays, a compromise has been found, and most of the uses of radiation are optimized. Today it is almost unbelievable that x-rays were, at one time, used to find the right pair of shoes (i.e., shoe-fitting fluoroscopy). Measurements made in recent years indicate that the doses to the feet were in the range of 0.07 \u2013 0.14 Gy for a 20-second exposure. This practice was halted when the risks of ionizing radiation were better understood.<\/p>\n<p>In the following points, we try to express enormous ranges of radiation exposure and a few doses from medical sources.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>1 \u00b5Sv<\/strong> \u2013 Eating one banana<\/li>\n<li><strong>1 \u00b5Sv &#8211; <\/strong>Extremity (hand, foot, etc.) X-ray<\/li>\n<li><strong>5 \u00b5Sv &#8211; <\/strong>Dental X-ray<\/li>\n<li><strong>10 \u00b5Sv<\/strong> \u2013 Average daily dose received from natural background<\/li>\n<li><strong>40 \u00b5Sv<\/strong> \u2013 A 5-hour airplane flight<\/li>\n<li><strong>100 \u00b5Sv<\/strong> \u2013 Chest X-ray<\/li>\n<li><strong>600 \u00b5Sv<\/strong> \u2013 mammogram<\/li>\n<li><strong>1 000 \u00b5Sv<\/strong> \u2013 Dose limit for individual members of the public, total effective dose per annum<\/li>\n<li><strong>3 650 \u00b5Sv<\/strong> \u2013 Average yearly dose received from natural background<\/li>\n<li><strong>5 800 \u00b5Sv<\/strong> \u2013 Chest CT scan<\/li>\n<li><strong>10 000 \u00b5Sv<\/strong> \u2013 Average yearly dose received from a natural background in Ramsar, Iran<\/li>\n<li><strong>20 000 \u00b5Sv<\/strong> \u2013 single full-body CT scan<\/li>\n<li><strong>80 000 \u00b5Sv &#8211; <\/strong>The annual local dose to localized spots at the bifurcations of segmental bronchi in the lungs caused by smoking cigarettes (1.5 packs\/day).<\/li>\n<li><strong>175 000 \u00b5Sv<\/strong> \u2013 Annual dose from natural radiation on a monazite beach near Guarapari, Brazil.<\/li>\n<li><strong>5 000 000 \u00b5Sv<\/strong> \u2013 Dose that kills a human with a 50% risk within 30 days (LD50\/30) if the dose is received over a <strong>very short duration<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>As can be seen, low-level doses are common in everyday life.<\/p>\n<h2>Tobacco &#8211; Smoking Cigarettes &#8211; Radiation Dose<\/h2>\n<p>In addition to chemical and nonradioactive carcinogens, tobacco and tobacco smoke contain small amounts of lead-210 and polonium-210, both of which are radioactive carcinogens. It must be emphasized that cigarettes and tobacco also contain polonium-210, originating from the decay products of radon, which stick to tobacco leaves. <strong>Polonium-210<\/strong> emits a 5.3 MeV alpha particle, which provides most of the equivalent dose. Due to decay of polonium-210, the annual local dose to localized spots at the bifurcations of segmental bronchi in the lungs caused by smoking cigarettes (1.5 packs\/day) is about 80 mSv\/year. Heavy smoking results in a dose of 160 mSv\/year. This dose is not readily comparable to the <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/protection-from-exposures\/dose-limits-radiation\/\">radiation protection limits<\/a> since the latter deal with whole-body doses. In contrast, the dose from smoking is delivered to a very small portion of the body. Many researchers believe that doses of polonium-210 are the origin of the high incidence of lung cancer among smokers.<\/p>\n<p>Recall that lead-210 and polonium-210 are daughter nuclei of radon-222. <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/sources-of-radiation\/radon-health-effects-health-risks\/radon-222-radiation-dose\/\"><strong>Radon-222<\/strong><\/a> is a gas produced by the decay of radium-226. Both are a part of the <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-power\/reactor-physics\/atomic-nuclear-physics\/radioactive-decay\/radioactive-decay-chain\/radioactive-series-radioactive-cascade\/uranium-series\/\">natural uranium series<\/a>. Since <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-power-plant\/nuclear-fuel\/uranium\/what-is-uranium\/\">uranium<\/a> is found in soil throughout the world in varying concentrations, also the dose of ga搜索引擎优化us radon varies throughout the world. <strong>Radon-222 <\/strong>is the most important and most stable isotope of radon. It has a half-life of only <strong>3.8 days<\/strong>, making radon one of the rarest elements since it decays away quickly. An important source of natural radiation is radon gas, which seeps continuously from bedrock but can, because of its high density, accumulates in the ground. The fact <strong>radon is gas<\/strong> plays a crucial role in the spreading of all its daughter nuclei. As radon-222 decays into lead-210, lead-210 can be attached to dust or moisture particles and be stuck to tobacco leaves. When these particles are concentrated by smoking and inhaled as smoke, some of lead-210 is retained by the body. Since lead-210 is a weak beta emitter, it does not cause major doses, but polonium-210 does.<\/p>\n<p>See also: <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/sources-of-radiation\/radon-health-effects-health-risks\/\">Radon &#8211; Health Effects<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The <strong>polonium-210<\/strong>, the decay product of lead-210, emits a <strong>5.3 MeV alpha particle<\/strong>, which provides most of the <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/equivalent-dose\/\">equivalent dose<\/a>. <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-power\/reactor-physics\/atomic-nuclear-physics\/fundamental-particles\/alpha-particle\/\">Alpha particles<\/a> that belong to <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/radiobiology\/high-let-and-low-let-radiation\/\">high-LET radiation<\/a> are fairly massive and carry a double positive charge. They tend to travel only a short distance and do not penetrate very far into a tissue, if at all. However, alpha particles will deposit their energy over a smaller volume (possibly only a few cells if they enter a body) and cause more damage to those few cells (more than 80 % of the absorbed energy from radon is due to the alpha particles). Therefore, the <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/equivalent-dose\/radiation-weighting-factor\/\">radiation weighting factor<\/a> for alpha radiation is equal to <strong>20<\/strong>. An <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/absorbed-dose\/\">absorbed dose<\/a> of 1 mGy by alpha particles will lead to an equivalent dose of 20 mSv.<\/p>\n<p>Special Reference: Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Annex B. UNSCEAR. New York, 2010. ISBN: 978-92-1-142274-0.<\/p>\n<h2>Nuclear Fallout &#8211; Radiation Doses<\/h2>\n<p>In general, <strong>nuclear fallout<\/strong> is the residual radioactive material from a nuclear blast that \u201cfalls out\u201d of the sky after an atmospheric explosion. <strong>Fallout<\/strong> can also refer to nuclear reactor accidents, although a nuclear reactor does not explode like a nuclear weapon. The isotopic signature of fallout from a nuclear blast is very different from the fallout from a serious power reactor accident.<\/p>\n<p>In the case of radiation doses from fallout, we consider the residual radioactive material from nuclear tests (not from reactor accidents) performed particularly in the two periods from 1954 to 1958 and 1961 to 1962. According to the UNSCEAR, about 502 atmospheric tests were conducted with a total fission and fusion yield of 440 Mt.<\/p>\n<p>Special Reference: Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Annex B. UNSCEAR. New York, 2010. ISBN: 978-92-1-142274-0.<\/p>\n<p><b>The fallout<\/b> from nuclear tests consists of <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-power\/fission\/fission-fragments\/\">fission fragments<\/a> and neutron activation products. When a blast occurs on the ground or in the atmosphere near the ground, large amounts of activation products are also formed from surface materials. The fallout is particularly significant in the neighborhood of the test site since the larger particles and most debris land on the ground (<strong>local fallout<\/strong>). But smaller particles may remain aloft in the upper atmosphere for years. These particles can be therefore distributed nearly uniformly around the world and contribute to so-called <strong>global fallout<\/strong>. <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/equivalent-dose\/\">Equivalent doses<\/a> from <strong>global fallout<\/strong> dropped from about 130 \u03bcSv\/year in 1963 to about <strong>10 \u03bcSv\/year<\/strong> in recent years.<\/p>\n<h2>Radiation Exposures from Electricity Generation<\/h2>\n<p>In this chapter, we would like to discuss a very interesting fact. It is generally known that the increasing use of nuclear power and electricity generation using <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-power-plant\/what-is-nuclear-reactor\/\">nuclear reactors<\/a> will lead to a small but increasing radiation dose to the general public. But it is not generally known that <strong>power generation from coal<\/strong> also creates additional exposures, and, what is more interesting. In contrast, exposure levels are very low. The <strong>coal cycle<\/strong> contributes more than half of the total radiation dose to the global population from electricity generation. The <strong>nuclear fuel cycle\u00a0<\/strong>contributes less than one-fifth of this. The <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/effective-dose\/collective-effective-dose\/\">collective dose<\/a>, which is defined as the sum of all individual effective doses in a group of people over the period or during the operation being considered due to ionizing radiation, is:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>670-1400 man<\/strong> <strong>Sv<\/strong> for coal cycle, depending on the age of the power plant,<\/li>\n<li><strong>130 man Sv<\/strong> for nuclear fuel cycle,<\/li>\n<li><strong>5-160 man Sv<\/strong> for geothermal power,<\/li>\n<li><strong>55 man Sv<\/strong> for natural gas<\/li>\n<li><strong>0.03 man Sv<\/strong> for oil<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Yes, these results should be seen from the perspective of the share of each technology in worldwide electricity production. Since 40 percent of the world\u2019s energy was produced by the coal cycle in 2010 and 13 percent by nuclear, the normalized collective dose will be about the same:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>0.7 &#8211; 1.4 man Sv\/GW.a (man sievert per gigawatt year) for coal cycle<\/li>\n<li>0.43 man Sv\/GW.a (man sievert per gigawatt year) for nuclear fuel cycle<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Special Reference: Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, UNSCEAR 2016 &#8211; Annex B. New York, 2017. ISBN: 978-92-1-142316-7.<\/p>\n<p>The above doses are related to public exposure. If we consider occupational exposure regarding the mining of rare-earth metals needed for construction, the largest collective dose to workers per unit of electricity assessed by the UNSCEAR came from <strong>solar power<\/strong>, followed by <strong>wind power<\/strong>. For solar power, the <strong>collective occupational\u00a0dose<\/strong> normalized to energy is a factor of forty and eighty larger than for the nuclear fuel cycle and coal cycle, respectively.<\/p>\n<p>Note that the collective effective dose is often used to estimate the total health effects, but according to the ICRP, this should be avoided (see more: <a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/effective-dose\/collective-effective-dose\/\">Collective Dose<\/a>).<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><div   id="8n9s8rpp6h"     class=\"lgc-column lgc-grid-parent lgc-grid-100 lgc-tablet-grid-100 lgc-mobile-grid-100 lgc-equal-heights \"><div   id="8n9s8rpp6h"     class=\"inside-grid-column\">\n<div   id="8n9s8rpp6h"    class=\"su-spoiler su-spoiler-style-default su-spoiler-icon-plus su-spoiler-closed\" data-scroll-offset=\"0\"><div   id="8n9s8rpp6h"    class=\"su-spoiler-title\" tabindex=\"0\" role=\"button\"><span class=\"su-spoiler-icon\"><\/span>References:<\/div><div   id="8n9s8rpp6h"    class=\"su-spoiler-content su-u-clearfix su-u-trim\">\n<p><strong>Radiation Protection:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Knoll, Glenn F., Radiation Detection and Measurement 4th Edition, Wiley, 8\/2010. ISBN-13: 978-0470131480.<\/li>\n<li>Stabin, Michael G., Radiation Protection and Dosimetry: An Introduction to Health Physics, Springer, 10\/2010. ISBN-13: 978-1441923912.<\/li>\n<li>Martin, James E., Physics for Radiation Protection 3rd Edition, Wiley-VCH, 4\/2013. ISBN-13: 978-3527411764.<\/li>\n<li>U.S.NRC, NUCLEAR REACTOR CONCEPTS<\/li>\n<li>U.S. Department of Energy, Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory. DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Volume 1 and 2. January 1993.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Nuclear and Reactor Physics:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>J. R. Lamarsh, Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Theory, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1983).<\/li>\n<li>J. R. Lamarsh, A. J. Baratta, Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, 3d ed., Prentice-Hall, 2001, ISBN: 0-201-82498-1.<\/li>\n<li>W. M. Stacey, Nuclear Reactor Physics, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2001, ISBN: 0- 471-39127-1.<\/li>\n<li>Glasstone, Sesonske. Nuclear Reactor Engineering: Reactor Systems Engineering, Springer; 4th edition, 1994, ISBN: 978-0412985317<\/li>\n<li>W.S.C. Williams. Nuclear and Particle Physics. Clarendon Press; 1 edition, 1991, ISBN: 978-0198520467<\/li>\n<li>G.R.Keepin. Physics of Nuclear Kinetics. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co; 1st edition, 1965<\/li>\n<li>Robert Reed Burn, Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Operation, 1988.<\/li>\n<li>U.S. Department of Energy, Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory. DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Volume 1 and 2. January 1993.<\/li>\n<li>Paul Reuss, Neutron Physics. EDP Sciences, 2008. ISBN: 978-2759800414.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div><\/div><div   id="8n9s8rpp6h"    class=\"su-divider su-divider-style-dotted\" style=\"margin:15px 0;border-width:2px;border-color:#999999\"><\/div><\/div><\/div><div   id="8n9s8rpp6h"     class=\"lgc-column lgc-grid-parent lgc-grid-33 lgc-tablet-grid-33 lgc-mobile-grid-100 lgc-equal-heights \"><div   id="8n9s8rpp6h"     class=\"inside-grid-column\"><\/div><\/div><div   id="8n9s8rpp6h"     class=\"lgc-column lgc-grid-parent lgc-grid-33 lgc-tablet-grid-33 lgc-mobile-grid-100 lgc-equal-heights \"><div   id="8n9s8rpp6h"     class=\"inside-grid-column\">\n<h2>See above:<\/h2>\n<p>Sources of Radiation<a href=\"http:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/nuclear-engineering\/radiation-protection\/sources-of-radiation\/\" class=\"su-button su-button-style-flat\" style=\"color:#606060;background-color:#ffffff;border-color:#cccccc;border-radius:10px;-moz-border-radius:10px;-webkit-border-radius:10px\" target=\"_self\"><span style=\"color:#606060;padding:7px 20px;font-size:16px;line-height:24px;border-color:#ffffff;border-radius:10px;-moz-border-radius:10px;-webkit-border-radius:10px;text-shadow:0px 0px 0px #000000;-moz-text-shadow:0px 0px 0px #000000;-webkit-text-shadow:0px 0px 0px #000000\"><i class=\"sui sui-link\" style=\"font-size:16px;color:#5d5d5d\"><\/i> <\/span><\/a><\/p><\/div><\/div><div   id="8n9s8rpp6h"     class=\"lgc-column lgc-grid-parent lgc-grid-33 lgc-tablet-grid-33 lgc-mobile-grid-100 lgc-equal-heights \"><div   id="8n9s8rpp6h"     class=\"inside-grid-column\"><\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":25686,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"generate_page_header":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/25861"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25861"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/25861\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38035,"href":"https:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/25861\/revisions\/38035"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/25686"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sitepourvtc.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}